Act Two, Scene Two · pp. 78–87
The Last Parting
Ten pages, two goodbyes: Helga leaves for New York without her daughter, and the play leaves Faith, and the audience, holding everything Evelyn tried to bury.
What happens
Helga, bound for New York, makes her final claim on her daughter: come with me. The confrontation that follows is the play’s emotional summit, two survivors measuring their wounds against each other. Eva/Evelyn: ‘I never wanted to live without you and you made me!’ The exchange the play is remembered by: ‘I wish you had died.’ ‘I wish you had lived.’ Helga’s verdict draws the line the play has been walking between two scales of pain: ‘My suffering is monumental. Yours is personal.’
And then the present resumes. Faith now knows the truth; the attic’s boxes have given up their secret. The ending is cyclical rather than resolved: a daughter discovering her mother’s hidden history, just as Eva once faced hers, with the Ratcatcher’s shadow never quite banished from the room. What Faith will do with the truth, and whether truth alone can end the pattern, is left with the audience.
A closer look
Two wishes
‘I wish you had died’ / ‘I wish you had lived’ is the play’s language at its most compressed: perfect syntactic mirroring, one word of difference, an abyss of meaning inside it. Eva means: a dead mother could be mourned; a living one indicts the person I became. Helga means: the girl I saved did not survive, someone else came back in her place. For AO2, this exchange is a gift, but only if you analyse the mirroring itself, the form of the lines, not merely their content.
A hierarchy of suffering?
‘My suffering is monumental. Yours is personal.’ Does the play endorse Helga’s distinction? The staging suggests something subtler: Helga’s suffering belongs to history, Evelyn’s to psychology, and the play refuses to rank them, because it has spent two acts showing the second growing directly out of the first. Strong essays hold this tension; weak ones pick a winner.
An ending that refuses to end
Nothing is mended. Evelyn does not integrate her past; Helga is not forgiven or forgiving; the play simply hands the inheritance on to Faith, and asks the audience to imagine the next thirty years. The cyclical structure is the point: trauma, untold, repeats its shape in the next generation. If your coursework question touches memory, family or the legacy of war, your conclusion probably lives here, in what the ending’s openness does to an audience rather than what it tells them.
Key quotations
| Quotation | Method | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| ‘I wish you had died.’ / ‘I wish you had lived.’ | Syntactic mirroring | One changed word carries the whole tragedy; form and meaning fused. |
| ‘I never wanted to live without you and you made me!’ | Accusation, paradox | The rescue experienced as abandonment: the play’s central wound said plainly at last. |
| ‘My suffering is monumental. Yours is personal.’ | Antithesis | Two scales of pain set against each other; the audience is left to weigh them. |
| ‘They took everything. They took my family. They took six years.’ | Anaphora (Helga) | Repetition as testimony: loss counted item by item because it cannot be said whole. |
Think it through
- Why does Samuels end with Faith rather than with Evelyn or Helga? What does the shift of focus to the third generation argue?
- Could this play end happily without becoming untrue? Try to sketch a reconciled ending and notice exactly what breaks.
- Where is the Ratcatcher at the close of the play, and what would your production do with him in the final image?
Towards the coursework
Whichever question you choose, your essay needs range across the whole play. Check your plan: does it draw on both acts, both time-frames, and at least four or five distinct dramatic techniques? The coursework guide has the full checklist.